Identity discourse within a geopolitical crisis: the case of Lithuania
LTReikšminiai žodžiai: NATO; Rusija (Russia); Diskurso analizė; Tapatybė; Saugumas; Discourse analysis; Identity; NATO; Security.
ENThe annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014 dramatically changed routine practices and perceptions about Lithuania’s foreign policy agenda. The threat to this small state’s security marked a new era of active searching for self-definition and policy direction. The article aims to analyse the dominant tendencies of Lithuania’s identity in foreign and security policy after 2014. Lithuania is selected precisely because of its vocal reaction and concerns after the annexation of Crimea. This article analyses speeches, comments and statements made within contemporary political discourse by key political leaders in Lithuania’s foreign and security policy. It argues that – in light of potential military threat – political leaders advocate for increased self-responsibility and readiness to act as the relations with their respective partners remain both crucial and complicated. [From the publication]
- Baimės koncepcija ir emocijos Lietuvos užsienio politikoje / Benas Brunalas. Lietuvos metinė strateginė apžvalga. 2016, t. 14, p. 169-208.
- Diplomatinė aporija : tarptautinė Lietuvos ir Rusijos santykių normalizacijos perspektyva / Gediminas Vitkus. Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2006. 220 p.
- Identity tensions: the case of Michail Golovatov’s release / Justinas Lingevičius. Lithuanian foreign policy review. 2015, vol. 34, p. 87-108.
- Kieno saugumas? Kuri tapatybė? : kritinės saugumo stadijos ir Lietuvos užsienio politika / Kęstutis Paulauskas. Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2010. 206 p.
