Chasing criminal wealth: broken expectations for the criminalization of illicit enrichment in Lithuania
LTReikšminiai žodžiai: Ukraina (Ukraine); Nusikalstamu būdu įgytas turtas; Neteisėtas praturtėjimas; Civilinis konfiskavimas; Nekaltumo prezumpcija; Proceeds of crime; Illicit enrichment; Civil confiscation; Presumption of innocence.
ENPurpose – This study aims at elaborating whether the criminalization of illicit enrichment has the potential to be an efficient and well-balanced measure against profiting from serious crime. Design/methodology/approach – This study offers a normative analysis of the concept of the criminalization of illicit enrichment, particularly from the perspective of the presumption of innocence. This paper supplements theoretical considerations using Lithuania, where illicit enrichment was criminalized a decade ago, as a case study. It analyses data of all 28 known criminal cases on illicit enrichment that resulted in judgements in Lithuania in 2015–2019. Findings – The author concludes that on neither a fundamental nor practical level can the assumption that the criminalization of illicit enrichment efficiently carries out the task for which it was created be supported. Moreover, efforts to implement this legal strategy might unbalance the system of illicit asset recovery measures and obstruct the implementation of other promising legal instruments. Originality/value – As very few states with developed democracy and strong rule of law traditions have implemented criminalization of illicit enrichment, there are very few if any empirical data or analysis of practices on this issue that could contribute to the theoretical discussion. This paper aims at contributing to fulfillment of this gap by presenting relevant data and insights from the perspective of Lithuanian criminal justice system. [From the publication]
- Baudžiamųjų įstatymų prieš neteisėtas pajamas ir korupciją leidyba: tarp gerų siekių ir legitimumo / Oleg Fedosiuk. Jurisprudencija. 2012, Nr. 19 (3), p. 1215-1233.
- Kad nusikaltimai neapsimokėtų : tradiciniai ir modernūs turto konfiskavimo mechanizmai / Skirmantas Bikelis, Bartautė Čepytė, Mindaugas Girdauskas, Aistė Medelienė, Matas Mulevičius, Rimantas Simaitis, Tautvydas Žėkas. Vilnius : Justitia, 2014. 420 p.
- Minimali konfiskuotino turto vertė legalumo ir proporcingumo principų bei racionalios baudžiamosios politikos kontekste / Skirmantas Bikelis. Kriminologijos studijos. 2022, Nr. 10, P. 30-47.
- Modeling the patterns of civil confiscation: balancing effectiveness, proportionality and the right to be presumed innocent / Skirmantas Bikelis. Baltic journal of law & politics. 2020, Vol. 13 No. 2, 25 p.
- Neteisėtas praturtėjimas kaip nusikalstama veika : ištakos, kriminalizavimo problema, taikymas, perspektyvos / Laurynas Pakštaitis. Jurisprudencija. 2013, Nr. 20 (1), p. 319-341.
- Neteisėto praturtėjimo nusikaltimo konstitucinė problematika / Justas Namavičius. Teisė. 2016, t. 101, p. 7-28.
- Pakartotinis įtartinos turto kilmės vertinimas - pateisinama viešojo intereso apsaugos priemonė ar žmogaus teisių pažeidimas? / Skirmantas Bikelis. Kriminologijos studijos. 2020, Nr. 8, p. 38-56.
