LTStraipsnyje pristatomas pilotinis tyrimas, kuriuo siekta ištirti Holokaustą Lietuvoje reprezentuojančių istorinių fotografijų charakteristiką bei panaudojimo būdus lietuviškoje ir užsienio istoriografijoje taip siekiant išsiaiškinti problemines temas tolesnėms Holokausto fotografijos Lietuvoje studijoms. Esama padėtis rodo aiškų istorinių tyrimų, skirtų fotografijų atsiradimo ir vėlesnės sklaidos aplinkybėms nustatyti, poreikį. Apie paviršutinišką fotografinių istorinių šaltinių traktavimą liudija vyraujantys tiek abstraktūs, tiek trumpi ar net klaidingi nuotraukų prierašai, vengimas įvardyti originalias vaizdų atsiradimo aplinkybes, jų autorius, o neretai – nurodyti šaltinį. Taip pat nėra tvirtai susiformavusio lietuviško Holokausto vizualikos kanono. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Holokausto istoriografija; 20 amžius; Nuotraukos (Holokaustas); Fotografijos dokumentiškumas; Istorinė fotografija; Getai; Cvi Hiršas Kadušinas (Zvi Hirsh Kadushin); Litvakai; Holocaust historiography; Photographic documentary; 20th century; Historic photography; Gheto; Jewish.
ENThe research presented in the article explores the features and use of historical photographs chosen to represent the Holocaust in Lithuania in Lithuanian and international historiography, including popular literature. Referring to the theoretical literature on Holocaust photography, critical areas of Holocaust photography are outlined, and images found in the historiography of the Lithuanian Holocaust are systemized accordingly. Secondly, by analyzing different categories (the photographer’s identity, topic, event, subject, location, caption type, archival source), photographs from Lithuanian and international publications are compared. Finally, the main critical aspects of the publication of photographs representing the Holocaust in Lithuania are identified and discussed, paying special attention to the issues of their iconic properties and authenticity. The results of the presented research show an obvious necessity for historical research on the circumstances of the emergence of Holocaust photography and its dissemination in later times. A superficial approach to historical photographic sources is evident from abstract, laconic and sometimes even erroneous captions, the failure to indicate the original circumstances of the appearance of specific images, omitting the photographer’s name or the archival source. Other aspects of photographic representations of the Holocaust worth mentioning are a strong countertrend to the prevailing perpetrator perspective, the predominance of images from Kaunas, and the prominence of the topic of ghetto life. This situation is mostly a result of the wide circulation of photographs taken by the Kaunas ghetto inmate Zvi Hirsh Kadushin (1910–1997) both in Lithuania and abroad. Pilot rather than conclusive, the present research aims to map out the main topics for the future research on Holocaust photography in Lithuania.