Southern and Eastern Europe in the Eurozone: convergence or divergence?
LTReikšminiai žodžiai: Ekonomikos augimas; Ekonomikos istorija; Konvergencija; Pinigų sąjunga; Convergence; Economic growth; Economic history; Monetary union.
ENA number of studies have concluded that, contrary to expectations, European monetary union has not reduced income disparities among the 12 Western European member countries. In fact, incomes per capita between Southern and Northern Eurozone members have diverged since the Eurozone was created, in contrast to earlier trends which had seen rapid convergence in living standards across Western Europe. The paper revisits this issue and investigates whether something similar occurred in the five Eastern European countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia) which joined the Eurozone between 2007 and 2015. The conclusion is that, despite similarities with Southern Europe in some areas, overall developments in Eastern Europe were different and led to convergence rather than divergence. Important reasons for this were Eastern Europe’s relatively high levels of institutional quality, a politically motivated determination to anchor these countries to the West and, possibly, the legacy of pre-war history. [From the publication]
- Comparing the institutional and organizational design of currency boards in transition countries / Nikolay Nenovsky, Kalin Hristov, Mihail Mihaylov. Eastern European economics. 2002, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 6-35.
- Convergence between the business cycles of Central and Eastern European countries and the Euro area / Nenad Stanisic. Baltic journal of economics. 2013, Vol. 13, no. 1, p. 63-74.
- Macroeconomic and financial stability in a monetary union : the case of Lithuania / Margarita Rubio, Mariarosaria Comunale. Economic systems. 2018, 42, p. 75-90.
