Kai kurie beprotybės ir meninės kūrybos santykių modeliai

LTStraipsnis skirtas Carlo Gustavo Jungo ir įtakingų postmodernistinės estetikos ideologų Michelio Foucault, Giles'io Deleuze'o bei Felixo Guattari itin suaktualintai beprotybės ir meninės kūrybos santykių problematikai. Straipsnio tikslas: išryškinti ir estetiniu aspektu konceptualiai apibrėžti kai kurias beprotybės formas konkrečiu Vakarų kultūros laikotarpiu, apžvelgti jų santykius su menine kūryba bei kitomis žmogaus "pyche" galiomis; atskleisti pamatines įvairių pažintinių perspektyvų nuostatas, susiejusias tarpusavyje tokius skirtingus reiškinius, kaip genialum as, estetinis pasaulio suvokimas, meninė kūryba, apsėstumas, beprotybė, instinktyvumas, psichinė liga ir pan. [Iš straipsnio, p. 446]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Estetika; Meno psichologija; Beprotybė; Psichinė patologija; Apsėstumas; Instinktyvumas; Menas; Meninė kūryba; Aesthetics; Art psychology; Insanity; Psychic pathology; Obsessiveness; Instinctiveness; Art; Artistic creation.

ENThe goal of this article: to highlight and describe conceptually some forms of insanity at a certain period of Western culture, to overview their relations with an artistic creation and other hum an psyche pow ers; to grope the substantial attitudes of cognitive prospects, where these attitudes relate such different phenomena as genius, aestethical cognition of the world, artistic creation, obsessiveness, insanity, instinctiveness, mental illness, etc. To question about the aestethic psychological aspects of the relations between insanity and artistic creation means not to limit yourself in the problem of causality; that means to question about the alternating conjucture of cognitive strategies as if it was the system of initial assumptions, where the cognition of in sanity and artistic forms is concurrent with the aesthetic conciousness and conceptions of the person in the mentioned period. The article gives the propositions, which describe the models of relations between in sanity and artistic creation. In the "compensative" limits of a model insanity and artistic creation are related by the compensative mechanisms of the mental structures; In the perspective of the psychoanalytical doctrines (next to the mentioned "compensative" model) insanity and artistic creation can be related at least by three ways: emerging processes in the level of the same inspirational sources; phenomena growing one into another; and executing the analogical corrective functions. In the field of positive psychopathological aesthetic ideas the biological model of a person's development interpreted artistic creation as a screen of the potential psychopathological symptoms, which diagnoses the mental state at the individual as well as common-cultural one. In the frame of the model called "theory of temperament" insanity and artistic creation are related in the level of predispositions.In the prospect of positive psychopathological ideas the mentioned phenomena are related through the specific topography of the person. The institute of a genius relates insanity and artistic creation in the frame of the person as the model of energetic system. In the field of voluntary neo-romantic aesthetic ideas artistic creation and insanity (which hides in the shadow of the pain) meet with one another as the quantities which inspire one another: pain/insanity contain the prospect, without it art would lose its depth. Artistic creation and insanity are related by the means of perform ed functions; these are the endeavour of a person's introspection, which contain the necessary evidence of hiding. [From the publication]