Lyderystės kultūros jūrų uoste ir laivyboje plėtros klausimu

LTŠio straipsnio tikslas, pasirinkus lyderystę jūrų uoste ir laivyboje kaip valdymo santykių kultūrą, – atskleisti jūrų verslo lyderystės raiškos bei plėtros metodologinę problematiką, aptariant jūrų verslo lyderystės edukacinę perspektyvą, ryškinant lyderystės principinius momentus ir antilyderystę, aktualizuojant savilyderystę, gyvenimo ir palaikančiąją lyderystę, charakterizuojant lyderystę psichologinių gynybos mechanizmų požiūriu, taikant pagrindinius tyrimo metodus – mokslinės literatūros analizę, lyginimą, interpretaciją ir sintezę. Tyrimo tipas – teorinis aprašomasis. Laikomasi epistemologinių nuostatų, kurias pagrindžia Jūrininkų rengimo, atestavimo ir budėjimo normų konvencija, egzistencializmas bei visybiško ugdymo paradigma. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: , jūrų uostas; Jūrų uostas; Kultūra; Laivyba; Lyderystė; Savilyderystė; Culture; Leadership; Seafaring; Seaport; Self-leadership.

ENThe object of the research is leadership as a culture of management relationships in the seaport and seafaring. The aim of the article is to identify methodological problems in relation to the expression and development of leadership in the field of marine business. The tasks of the research are as follows: to study the educational perspective of marine business leadership, the main points of leadership and anti-leadership, self-leadership, leadership of life and supportive leadership and leadership in terms of psychological defense mechanisms. Main methods such as scientific literature analysis, comparison, interpretation, synthesis were used in the research. The type of the research is theoretically descriptive. Epistemological principles of the research are as follows: STCW convention: standards of training, certification and watchkeeping for seafarers; existentialism and the paradigm of comprehensive education. The educational perspective of marine business leadership is based on a combination of moral and business authority of the boss, on the comprehensive value of higher education, on the example of the power of teachers as deep personalities and on the application of leadership principles in maritime and seaport studies. Anti-leadership, lack of love for work and disrespect of a boss for his/her subordinates do not allow to express leadership. Leadership culture determines the prestige of working on board and in the seaport, and the level of attractiveness for future employees. The lack of leadership in the marine business is naturally compensated by control and bureaucracy. Supportive leadership and opportunity to be proud of one’s own boss determine self-leadership. Leader is a psychological direction of a teamwork on board and in a seaport company. [...].New generations can consider leadership as a traditional dictatorship with the new name. Leadership is expressed as self-leadership from the point of view of psychological defense mechanisms, and the ability to recognize them and to manage oneself in front of them. The importance of ensuring personal integrity allows to model the directions of leadership development in integrated higher education curricula, ensuring a comprehensive approach to leadership content and conditions of personal selfdevelopment in order to achieve effective self-leadership by strengthening the safety culture in the activities of seaport companies and seafaring. [From the publication]

• Vadyba / Management
• Sociologija / Sociology