Sakinio ribos dialoguose: siejimas

LTTradiciškai manoma, kad sakinys yra žodžių junginys, turintis veiksnį ir tarinį, net jeigu jie tik numanomi. Tačiau kyla klausimas, ar ši taisyklė galioja visiems tekstams. Vienaip bus ištisiniame tekste, kitaip - dialoguose [5: 121-122] ar poliloguose [4: 36-70], kuriuose vyrauja ne ištisinis tekstas, o tekstų nutraukimas ar jų (dviejų ar net kelių) simultaniškumas. [...]. [Iš straipsnio, p. 157]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Tekstai; Dialogai; Sakiniai; Sakinių ribos; Simultaniškumas; Texts; Dialogues; Sentences; Sentences margins; Simultaneity.

ENThe study of sentence margins in different dialogues and polylogues enables us to make the conclusion that the margins in dialogues as distinct from the sentences of continuous texts become not very exact, sometimes they disappear altogether, when the words of two or more members are pronounced simultaneously. However, the remarks of the first and the second (the third, etc.) speakers pronounced at the same time sometimes perform quite different functions: the text of the main speaker Practically performs the communicative function, whereas the remarks of the second speaker pronounced simultaneously perform not only the communicative function, but also the phatic function generally, informing the first speaker if his information is understood adequately. The signals of the phatic function as mhhh, are intended to verify that the second speaker is listening to the first speaker overall. Such phatic reactions are a reduced part of a sentence of the first speaker. Consequently the sentence of the first speaker, meeting the requirements of every sentence, is reduced by the second speaker to a word and a phatic signal, meaning "I understand you". The material of the study enables the author to state, that solving the margins of sentences in dialogues and speaking about "aggressors" and "victims" of the dialogue, we should pay attention to what we know about the members and the situation of the dialogue. The following parameters of the conversation ar e significant: what is being discussed, what is the speakers' attitude towards the termination of the conversation, if the interruption has the purpose to change the topic. The termination of a topic or a sentence or "superposition" of the text of a speaker on the text of another speaker almost always shows the interest to continue the conversation.The simultaneity of sayings of two or more speakers takes a special place in the dialogues fulfilling two different functions: in some case the simultaneity is an example of successful cooperation and relation of sentences, in other cases the simultaneity is intended to terminate the conversation and to delimitate the sentences of particular members of the dialogues. [From the publication]