Aplinkybiniai antriniai predikatyvai lietuvių kalboje

Link to:
Collection:
Mokslo publikacijos / Scientific publications
Document Type:
Straipsnis / Article
Language:
Lietuvių kalba / Lithuanian
Title:
Aplinkybiniai antriniai predikatyvai lietuvių kalboje
Alternative Title:
Circumstantial secondary predicates in Lithuanian
Authors:
Čižik-Prokaševa, Veslava
In the Journal:
Baltu filoloģija. 2019, t. 28, nr. 2, p. 5-34
Subject Category:
LT
Žodžių jungimas. Sakiniai. Sakinio dalys / Word phrases. Sentences. Sentence parts.
Summary / Abstract:

LTŠio straipsnio tyrimo objektas – aplinkybiniai antriniai predikatyvai. Remiantis rastais pavyzdžiais, straipsnyje nustatomos jų reikšmės, žymėjimas lietuvių kalboje ir jų vieta sakinyje. Bandoma nustatyti, ar lietuvių kalbos aplinkybiniai antriniai predikatyvai skiriasi nuo kitų antrinių predikatyvų. Taip pat siekiama papildyti duomenis, pateiktus lietuvių kalbos gramatikose ir sintaksės tyrimuose. Straipsnyje remiamasi pavyzdžiais iš Kauno VDU Kompiuterinės lingvistikos centro sudaryto „Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos tekstyno“, pavyzdžiais, rastais įvairiuose sintaksiniuose straipsniuose ir knygose, bei pavyzdžiais, rastais naudojant interneto paieškos sistemą „Google“. [Leidėjo anotacija]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Antrinis predikatyvas; Depiktyvas; Aplinkybinis antrinis predikatyvas; Aplinkybinių antrinių predikatyvų tipai ir žymėjimas; Secondary predicate; Depictive; Circumstantial; Types and marking of circumstantials.

ENThere are two types of free non-resultative secondary predicates in Lithuanian: depictives and circumstantials. They differ from each other not only in semantics, the scope of negation, inclusion in the predication of the main sentence, but sometimes in morphosyntax. There are five types of circumstantials in Lithuanian: time, cause, concession, condition and intention. Circumstantials of time (41,4 %) and cause (24,9 %) are the most often used, circumstantials of concession (18 %) and condition (12,7 %) are used less, circumstantials of intention are the rarest (only 3 %). In Lithuanian circumstantials are expressed by various parts of speech and various constructions. Most examples were collected with circumstantials expressed by adjectives (21,3 %), participles (passive – 18,8 %, active – 14,2 %), semi-participles (16,3 %) and nouns (15,5 %), less frequently by adverbs (8 %) and gerunds (5,9 %). Circumstantials are mostly expressed by constructions with words as (kaip) (23,2 %), being (būdamas) (22,8 %), still, yet (dar) (22,8 %), and (ir) (13,9 %) and even (net) (11,8 %), constructions with without (be) (3,8 %) and already (jau) (1,7 %) are used rarely. The number of circumstantials expressed by the parts of speech is 239 and expressed by constructions – 237. It can be said that the usage of one and the other is the same. Depictives expressed by the parts of speech are used three times more often than expressed by constructions. Furthermore the circumstantials expressed by numerals or pronouns did not occur. Hence morphosyntactically the circumstantials differ somewhat from the depictives. It was determined that in Lithuanian circumstantials are mostly used before the predicate (models Ar + AP + T and AP + Ar + T), while depictives are mostly used after the predicate.Furthermore sometimes the usage of a free non-resultative secondary predicate before or after the main predicate may help to distinguish depictives from circumstantials. [From the publication]

DOI:
10.22364/bf.28.2.01
ISSN:
1691-0036
Subject:
Kalbotyra / Linguistics
Related Publications:
Permalink:
https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/83179
Updated:
2020-03-07 18:39:17
Metrics:
Views: 43    Downloads: 9
Export:
Download