Affirmative action in the Western Borderlands of the late Russian Empire

ENThis article argues that apart from a couple of cases, there were no situations where the Russian imperial government would have supported Lithuanian national culture as a counterbalance against Poles, and more generally, that the policy of “divide and rule” was in principle not applied on the empire's western periphery regarding other non-dominant ethnic groups. A more general reason for not implementing such a policy was related to many officials’ belief that the government should seek integration, acculturation, or even assimilation of non-Russian ethnicities. At the same time, on the Russian mental map, the Northwest Region was understood not just as part of the empire, but as part of Russian national territory. In such a territory, most of the government subscribed to a discourse of nationalism that permitted no means of support for the strengthening of non-Russian nationalisms. Finally, social radicalism of the Lithuanian, Latvian, or Estonian national movements was another obstacle for tsarist officials to support these “peasant” nationalities. [cambridge.org]

• Rusų nacionalistai prieš Kauno gubernatorių: kitataučIų švietimo draugijos kaip pavojus imperijai 1907-1910 m / Darius Staliūnas. Lietuvos istorijos metraštis 2023, 2023/2, p. 55-80.
• Why Catholics rebel: tsarist confessional policy as a catalyst of grassroots opposition in the western borderlands / Darius Staliūnas. Canadian Slavonic Papers. 2022, 64, 1, p. 64-88.