A. R. Niemio lietuvių tautosakos rinkinių paveldas

• LLTI: publikacijos tekstas

• Daugirdaitė, Vilma, parengė [com]
• Ūsaitytė, Jurgita, parengė [com]
• Jakubynienė, Andželika, parengė [com]
• Garšvienė, Eligija, parengė [com]
• Skujytė-Razmienė, Asta, parengė [com]
• Visackienė, Rima, parengė [com]
• Žilienė, Irena, parengė [com]
• Ciesiūnas, Arūnas, parengė [com]

LTElektronine publikacija „A. R. Niemio lietuvių tautosakos rinkinių paveldas“ pristatomas suomių folkloristo Augusto Roberto Niemio (Aukusti Robert Niemi, 1869–1931) spausdintų ir rankraštinių lietuvių tautosakos rinkinių palikimas. Toks modelis buvo parankus tiek dėl prieinamumo, tiek dėl galimybės šalia vienas kito pateikti ne tik redaguotą, bet ir autentišką tekstą, o tai ypač svarbu siekiant paskatinti šios medžiagos recepciją akademiniame ir kultūriniame diskursuose. [Iš Pratarmės]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Augustas Robertas Niemis; Tautosakos rinkiniai; Aukusti Robert Niemi; Folklore collections.

ENFinnish professor Aukusti Robert Niemi (1869–1931) is truly a unique case in the history of our culture: during a historical period fraught with difficulties, he came to Lithuania, led by scientific aspirations, and for many years fostered cultural ties between Lithuania and his native Finland. He also participated in relevant political discussions of the period and contributed to the reform of the education system in Lithuania’s schools. As time went on, the legacy of his social and cultural activities fell into oblivion, yet Niemi’s contribution to the development of Lithuanian folklore always remained in the focus of researchers in the field of humanities. Particularly relevant is Niemi’s work that is still used in folklore research: his comparative research of songs and the folklore heritage that he collected, which is now presented in this electronic publication ( A. R. Niemio lietuvių tautosakos rinkinių paveldas / A. R. Niemi’s heritage of Lithuanian folklore collections). An electronic version of the folklore collection was the best option due to both its accessibility and the opportunity to present side by side not only the edited version, but also the authentic printed and manuscript versions. This is particularly important when the goal is to encourage this material’s reception in academic and cultural discourse. [From the preface]