NATO options and dilemmas for deterring Russia in the Baltic States

LTReikšminiai žodžiai: Atgrasymas; Baltijos valstybės; Gynyba; NATO; Nacionalinis saugumas; Baltic states; Defense; Deterrence; NATO; National security; Rusija (Russia).

ENAccording to the NATO’s collective defence strategy and the principle of deterrence, “no one should doubt NATO’s resolve if the security of any of its members were to be threatened”. In this sense, credible deterrence acts as a guarantee for peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region. However, recent events in Ukraine and Georgia have revealed the potential weaknesses of the current deterrence models. Without any overt fear of retaliation, we have seen Russia’s aggressive steps towards its neighbours, which were planned and executed with great sophistication, initiative, agility and decisiveness. Although contrary to Ukraine and Georgia which are not the members of the Alliance, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are granted security guarantees in the NATO framework, the Baltic countries clearly constitute Russia’s point of contact with NATO and are, therefore, also subject to the interests of Russia to test mutual capabilities and commitment, and to send strategic messages to the Alliance. In this context, the article aims to assess how credible is the deterrence posture provided by NATO in avoiding potential aggression on the part of Russia against the Baltic countries. [From the publication]

• Baltic States cyber security policy: development of digital capabilities in 2017-2022 / Marek Górka. Stosunki międzynarodowe 2023, 3, 15, p. 1-20.
• Foreign policy analysis of a Baltic State: Lithuania and 'Grybauskaitė doctrine' / Tomas Janeliūnas. London : Routledge, 2021. xi, 242 p.
• Researching Baltic security challenges after the annexation of Crimea / Viljar Veebel. Journal on Baltic security. 2019, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 41-52.