Folkloristika nepriklausomoje Lietuvoje (1918–1940): istorijos metmenys

LTPo Antrojo pasaulinio karo prasidėjusi sovietinė Lietuvos okupacija ne vienam dešimtmečiui nulėmė folkloro tyrimų linkmę, nepalikdama galimybės ne tik tęsti nepriklausomoje Lietuvoje pradėtus tautosakos darbus, bet ir pažinti neideologizuotą ano meto folkloristikos istoriją be nutylėjimų, dviprasmiškų formuluočių. Todėl prieš 80 metų prasidėjusi Lietuvių tautosakos archyvo istorija paakino grįžtelėti atgal ir pakalbėti ne tik apie jo įsteigimą ir veiklą, bet apskritai apie folkloristiką nepriklausomoje Lietuvoje. Straipsnyje, pasitelkus įvairiuose archyvuose ir rankraštynuose išsibarsčiusius dokumentus, periodikoje skelbtas to meto dvasią pajusti leidžiančias publikacijas, ne vienu atveju išaugdavusias į diskusijas, siekiama išryškinti lietuvių folkloristikos, tuomet dar tik brendusios ir besiformavusios kaip savarankiška disciplina, istorijos kontūrus. Sujungiant įvairiuose šaltiniuose dažnai atsietai pateikiamą pabirą informaciją ir papildant ją iki šiol neskelbtais archyviniais duomenimis, aptariama, kokia buvo kultūrinė, akademinė, politinė terpė atsirasti centralizuotoms tautosakos institucijoms (Tautosakos komisijai, Komisijai tautos melodijoms rinkti ir tvarkyti, Lietuvių tautosakos archyvui), taip pat – kokie uždaviniai joms kelti ir kaip pavyko juos įgyvendinti. Bandant į nuoseklią grandinę sudėlioti atskirus faktus, tenka gręžtis ir į asmeninius prie lietuvių folkloristikos ištakų stovėjusių literatų ir folkloristų santykius, atspindinčius galbūt ne sovietmečiu akcentuotas asmenines ambicijas, o daug platesnes ano meto kultūrines tendencijas. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Lietuvių folkloristika; Istorija; Tautosaka; Tautosakos komisija; Lietuvių tautosakos archyvas; Lithuanian folkloristics; History; Folklore; Folklore Commission; Lithuanian Folklore Archives.

ENThe Soviet occupation starting after the WWII determined the direction of folklore research in Lithuania for decades, not only taking away the possibility of continuing the folklore studies launched already in the independent interwar Lithuania, but even that of appreciating the ideologically untainted history of folkloristics from that period. The 80th anniversary of the Lithuanian folklore archives that is celebrated this year encouraged us turning back and revisiting this span in the history of the Lithuanian folkloristics, which at the time was just acquiring the shape of an independent scholarly discipline. Based on various documents scattered in different archives and repositories and on the relevant publications in periodicals of the time in question, the author of the article discusses the cultural, academic and political situation of establishing the first centralized folklore institutions (the Folklore Commission, the Commission for Gathering Folk Melodies, and the Lithuanian Folklore Archives). The author also analyzes the tasks that these institutions had to fulfill as well as the ways in which the representatives of different schools of folklore research dealt with these tasks. An important prerequisite for establishing a folklore research center in the independent Lithuania was founding of the Lithuanian University, which joined humanitarians willing and ready to organize the research activities, and raising various issues related to the investigations of the national culture, its dissemination and collection in view of the future research.Therefore, it is hardly accidental that in 1930 the Folklore Commission was established at the Faculty of Humanities. It was the first official institution in charge of folklore: collection of the Lithuanian folklore and preparing for its systematization. As many other commissions of the time, it also launched publication of series entitled Mūsų tautosaka [‘Our Folklore’] – the first research journal in folklore, which published numerous collections, ethnographic descriptions of daily life and customs, and research articles. However, due to the lack of a broader understanding of folklore and in absence of educated folklore specialists, folklore was primarily regarded as a source material for literature and science, while research was frequently overshadowed in the Commission’s activities by folklore popularization. Nevertheless, in the course of the 1930s significant changes took place in the Ministry of Education and in the cultural policy that it implemented. These changes affected folkloristics as well. In 1934, Juozas Tonkūnas was appointed as the new Minister of Education. Having his background in the academia, he radically changed the direction of the national culture policy, attempting finally to bring the abstract rhetoric concerning the rather obscure “national culture” onto a solid basis. Such basis, according to him, could only be established as a result of the scholarly research, and more precisely – studies of Lithuanian language, literature, history, and folklore. It is also important, that academic community had matured by that time and was ready for the changes to take place. In the 1930s, the University of Vytautas Magnus introduced a separate course in Lithuanian folklore, while in 1934 a Chair in Ethnics was finally established. [...].

• Etnologija / Ethnology
• Istorija / History