Teisėsaugos institucijų užduotis kriminalinėje žvalgyboje

LTStraipsnyje nagrinėjama teisėsaugos institucijų užduoties teisinė prigimtis bei sampratos problemos. Pagrindinis dėmesys skiriamas teisėsaugos institucijų užduoties santykio su kitais savo turiniu labai panašiais kriminalinės žvalgybos informacijos rinkimo būdais nustatymui. Siekiama įžvelgti, išskirti ir analizuoti pagrindinius teisėsaugos institucijų užduoties požymius lyginant juos su tokių kriminalinės žvalgybos informacijos rinkimo būdų, kaip agentūrinė veikla, nusikalstamos veikos imitavimas bei slaptoji operacija, požymiais. Straipsnyje keliami klausimai dėl teisėsaugos institucijos užduoties įtvirtinimo Lietuvos Respublikos kriminalinės žvalgybos įstatyme tikslingumo bei jos teisinio reglamentavimo tinkamumo. Tyrimų metu naudojami duomenys gauti apklausus kriminalinės žvalgybos ekspertus bei teismų praktikos analizės rezultatai. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Teisėsaufos institucijos; Kriminalinė žvalgyba; Law enforcement institution; Criminal intelligence.

ENThe article deals with the issue of the legal nature and the problems related to understanding of an assignment of a law enforcement institution. The author is trying to identify the relationship between an assignment of a law enforcement institution and the very similar ways of obtaining criminal intelligence information. The main features of an assignment of a law enforcement institution are identifying and analysing in comparison to the features of the other means of the obtaining criminal intelligence information such as a covert operation, conduct imitating a criminal act and agent activities. A particular focus of research is drawn on the expediency of including an assignment of a law enforcement institution into the regulation of the act of Law on criminal intelligence and its relevance. The author concluded that the implementation of an assignment of a law enforcement institution such as conduct imitating a criminal act legally has been interpreted as an offense before the criminal code of Lithuania entered into force. Afterwards an assignment of a law enforcement institution like conduct imitating a criminal act became a circumstance eliminating criminal liability. Since that time the criminal code considers that person shall not be held criminally liable where he participated in the activities of a criminal association or an organized group and in the criminal acts committed by it while performing another lawful assignment of a law enforcement institution and did not exceed the limits of this assignment.The order of the implementation of performance of an assignment of a law enforcement institution was included in the regulation of the new Law on criminal intelligence. New Law on criminal intelligence provides a definition of an assignment of a law enforcement institution and the new definitions of the other ways of the obtaining criminal intelligence information. Some of these new definitions are abstract and difficult to comprehend. That shows uncertainties of the system of the related concepts used in criminal intelligence. When entities of criminal intelligence couldn’t understand the requirements of Law correctly, the consequences of it could be the possibilities to break human rights and freedoms. The lack of the definition of the criminal intelligence actions in the Law of criminal intelligence indicates the problems of the legal regulation. An assignment of a law enforcement institution in criminal intelligence could be understandable as an order to obtain information or execute another related action given from entities of criminal intelligence to covert an employee. [From the publication]