Rėmimasis precedentais Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo jurisprudencijoje
LTReikšminiai žodžiai: Precedentas; Precedent.
ENThe paper is focused on the question when Constitutional Court’s of the Republic of Lithuania precedents have to be followed and when they should be departed from. The answer is sought in the Court’s explicitly provided principles of the doctrine of precedent and cases where the Court refused to follow its precedential rules. Among these cases, most are the Court’s rulings which dealt with the issue of precedent’s applicability under very similar circumstances. In the majority of them the Court found that precedential rule in the later case had to be departed from. These cases contain several indicators which help to foresee whether the Court will follow precedential rules which it has established in its rulings: that some reasons from the previous decision cannot be used in the later case, while maintaining consistency of entire reasoning; requirements of the rule in the later case are not ignored fully, but are implemented at least to some extent. Also in dealing with the question of precedent’s applicability, it is important to bear in mind, that the Court follows its position on individual cases and position on more common aspects – with regard to that and precedent’s role in the evaluation of the later case, standard of precedent’s applicability may vary. The research leads to a conclusion that in some cases literal application of court’s explicitly formulated reasons would be inconsistent with the court’s doctrine of precedent. [From the publication]
- Alternatyvi konstitucinė teisė / Egidijus Šileikis. Vilnius : Teisinės informacijos centras, 2005. 603 p.
- Ar teismui lengva išlikti tik interpretatoriumi? / Egidijus Baranauskas. Jurisprudencija. 2009, Nr. 2 (116), p. 201-210.
- Konstitucijos interpretavimo metodologiniai pagrindai / Gediminas Mesonis ; Mykolo Romerio universitetas. Vilnius : Registrų centras, 2010. 296 p.
- Konstitucijos interpretavimo principai ir ribos / Vytautas Sinkevičius. Jurisprudencija. 2005, Nr. 67 (59), p. 7-19.
- Oficialios konstitucinės doktrinos koregavimo problemos / Egidijus Jarašiūnas. Jurisprudencija. 2009, Nr. 1 (115), p. 39-70.
- Teisės aiškinimas ir jo privalomumas / Remigijus Šimašius. Teisės problemos. 2004, Nr. 2 (44), p. 8-29.
- Teisės samprata : logikos taikymo problematika / Jaunius Gumbis. Teisė. 2010, t. 76, p. 46-62.
- Teisminio precedento reikšmė romanų-germanų teisinėje sistemoje : disertacija / Vitas Vasiliauskas. Vilnius, 2004. 183 lap.
- Teismo aktyvumo kuriant ir aiškinant teisę plėtros tendencija, motyvai ir problemos / Tomas Berkmanas. Teisės problemos. 2004, Nr. 2 (44), p. 30-47.
- Teismo precedentas kaip teisės šaltinis Lietuvoje : oficiali konstitucinė doktrina,teisinio mąstymo stereotipai ir kontrargumentai / Egidijus Kūris. Jurisprudencija. 2009, Nr. 2 (116), p. 131-149.
- Teismo precedentas Lietuvoje : konstitucinė maksima ir jos įgyvendinimo problemos / Gediminas Sagatys. Justitia. 2009, Nr. 2, p. 2-15.
- The Role of judicial precedent in the court practice of Lithuania / Dangutė Ambrasienė, Solveiga Cirtautienė. Jurisprudencija. 2009, Nr. 2 (116), p. 61-78.
