LTStraipsnyje aptariamas Simono Daukanto rašybos kūrimo(si) etapas, susijęs su jo ankstyvąja leksikografija. Daukantas rėmėsi Daukšos, Sirvydo darbais, Kleino Grammatica Litvanica (1653), vadovėliuose pateikė nemažai metų vartotą sudėtinių grafemų inventorių ir vartosenos paaiškinimą, jis buvo reformatorius, nors dauguma jo inovacijų neprigijo. Rašyboje gausu variantų, maža taisyklių. Ankstyvosios leksikografijos grafemų inventoriuje yra rašmenų, kurių kilmės mokslininkai nenurodo [...]. Rankraštinių žodynėlių inventorius panašus į Žodrodžio, todėl sutampančius visų trijų žodynėlių rašmenis galima laikyti baziniais ankstyvosios leksikografijos balsiniais rašmenimis be diakritikų. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Daukanto rašyba; Epitome Historiae Sacrae; Grafemos su diakritikais; Inovaciniai rašmenys; Žodrodys; Žodrodys, Epitome Historiae Sacrae; Daukantas; Daukantas' orthography; Epitome Historiae Sacrae; Graphemes with diacritics; Innovative characters; Orthography; Žodrodys.
ENThe article discusses the stage of the development of Simonas Daukantas’ orthography that is related with his early lexicography. Daukantas’ orthography was built on the works of Daukša and Sirvydas - prominent figures from Lithuania Proper and Lithuania Minor - and Klein’s Grammatica Litvanica (Grammar of the Lithuanian Language, 1653). Daukantas introduced in his textbooks the inventory of time-tested compound graphemes of quite a sustained usage and explained the particularities of their use. The creation of the orthographic system by Daukantas revealed him to be a reformer who was prone to frequent changes in his orthographic inventory, ample use of variants, and a low number of rules. The majority of his innovations have failed to receive the public acclaim and have rooted in the usage of literary language. The inventory of graphemes of the early lexicography included nearly all tile graphemes taken over by Daukantas; although the inventory turned out to have graphemes that were theoretically undefined - graphemes from manuscript dictionaries with their origin unspecified by scientists and unrepresented as innovations [...]. The inventory of manuscript dictionaries is very similar to that of Žodrodys, therefore the coinciding characters of all the three dictionaries may be considered as basic early lexicography vowel characters without diacritics. [From the publication]