LTPirminės sveikatos priežiūros sistemos pacientai skundžiasi negalavimais, kurie nepaaiškinami organine patologija. Sudėtinga diagnostika, reikalaujanti daugybės įvairių tyrimų, menkos negalavimų palengvinimo ar šalinimo prognozės lemia įvairias sveikatos priežiūros sistemos problemas. Pacientai, kurie skundžiasi mediciniškai nepaaiškinamais negalavimais, dažnai yra laikomi ekonomine našta sveikatos priežiūros sistemai, taip pat jie mažina mediko profesijos autoritetą, nes, esant problemiškai diagnozei, sunkiau skirti gydymą. Šio straipsnio tikslas – remiantis pirminės sveikatos priežiūros sistemos vadovų interviu aptarti, kaip mediciniškai nepaaiškinami negalavimai traktuojami pirminės sveikatos priežiūros sistemoje. Straipsnyje vadovaujamasi prielaida, kad pirminės sveikatos priežiūros vadovai, anot R. Collinso, labiau tapatinasi su institucija, ją reprezentuoja ir atstovauja institucijos interesams. Pirminės sveikatos priežiūros sistemos vadovų interviu patvirtino šias prielaidas. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Institucijų vadovai; Mediciniškai nepaaiškinami negalavimai; Pirminės sveikatos priežiūros sistema; Sveikatos sampratos tipologija; Managers of health institutions; Managers of institutions; Medically unexplained illnesses; Primary health care; Typology of health conception.
ENIn the primary health care system (PHCS) there are illnesses unrelated to any organic pathology. They are described as medically unexplained illnesses (MUI). The debatable origin of the symptoms raises a number of questions for PHCS. Difficult diagnosis requiring a large number of various tests. Patients complaining of medically unexplained illnesses are considered to be an economic burden to the health care system and undermine the image of the medical profession. The article discusses the interest of the PHCS from the point of MUI. The analysis is grounded on the data of interview with directors of primary health care institutions (policlinics). According to R. Collins, the managers of very high positions of the hierarchical systems identify themselves with the system. They identify their interests with the interests of the system. It means that from the point of the MUI the directors are in a very controversial position. On one hand, they are inclined to maintain the biomedical conception of disease. This conception allows to define a very strict line between the biomedical reasons of diseases and speculations about diseases. In this case they prefer a clearer diagnosis because it improves the image of a PHC institution and doctors. On the other hand, the MUI serves as a very easy way to get more money from the National Health Insurance Fund. Every PHC institution have second-level-specialists and get money for each consultation of a specialist. The institutions’ interest is to direct more patients from the first level to the second level and get more money. [From the publication]