LTLietuvos švietimo teisiniame diskurse, remiantis tarpdisciplininiais – švietimo politikos ir ugdymo kokybės vadybos – tyrimais, mėginama naujai pažvelgti į švietimą reglamentuojančių dokumentų interpretavimo sampratas ir konceptualizuoti reglamentinės dokumentalistikos tyrimų metodologijos paradigmą. Pastaruoju aspektu švietimo dokumentų interpretavimo metodologijos nagrinėjimas yra labai menkai išplėtotas. Šiame straipsnyje siekiama aptarti švietimą reglamentuojančių dokumentų darybos (turinio kontekstų) aspektus, pateikiant konkrečius ikimokyklinio ir priešmokyklinio ugdymo kokybės valdymo tyrimus, taip pat išsamiai išanalizuojant interpretavimo metodologines kryptis bei metodų tipologiją. Bandyta pagal švietimo politikoje taikomą dokumentų turinio perspektyvą apčiuopti, kaip pagal situaciją kontekstualiai pristatomas ikimokyklinio ir priešmokyklinio ugdymo kokybės valdymo diskursas. Buvo svarbu nustatyti, kokias reikšmes diskurso kategorijos turi švietimo posistemių veiksmingumui ir kaip jos implikuoja posistemių organizacinę elgseną ir kaitos strategijas. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Ikimokyklinis ir priešmokyklinis ugdymas; Interpretavimo metodologija; Reglamentinė dokumentalistika; Ugdymo kokybė; Valdymo diskursas; Švietimo politika; Education policy; Educational policy; Interpretation methodology; Management discourse; Methodology; Pre-primary and primary education; Quality of education; Regulating documentation; Regulatory Documentation.
ENArticle strives at having a new look at the content analysis of the documentation regulating education through a new paradigm which is like a qualitative interpretation methodology of the data text. It allows appealing to the interpretation of the text in the managerial political context and orienting towards such situations that are important to every participant of the system of education who strives at a more detailed understanding of the basics of the documents regulating and reflecting educational policies. Documents regulating education are analysed with regard to the following position: they are characterised by a certain dynamism and alternation, not only textual, but also contextual, requiring from the researcher to considerfactors, events and the variety ofsituations affecting educational policies. The authors are analysing documents regulating quality management in the first link of the system of education (pre-school education); they describe their normative conception and the contexts of the meaning of the system of rights and obligations. It is pointed out that while analysing the documentation, legal relationships with the child, with children as legal subjects become of paramount importance.The authors point out to the difficulty of analysing this sort of documentation, because the texts of the documents express socio-cultural complexity of the phenomenon of childhood and the values of the culture of democratic policy. It is suggested to look at the analysis of the documentation regulating the management of quality of pre-school education through understanding of the child, children, their needs, the context of the quality of the purposeful education and the discourse manifesting its management – children become not only participants of self-education but teacher's/head teacher's partners. However, the authors claim that in such a case the reflection of the documentation lands in a dubious position, because it is sought to disclose its "real" structure by revealing the culture of national rights, able to rationally project the childhood phenomenon in the legal universe, while analysing contexts giving sense to the development of social empowering of the child in an objective way. While performing the content analysis of the documentation, the data proving the importance of the documentation functioning in the preschool contexts (social wellbeing of the child, non-formal education, minimal average care, self-education and social education services) are taken into consideration. [...]. [From the publication]