Ekonominės socialinės būklės ir nenaudojamų statinių pasiskirstymo sąsajos Lietuvos kaime

Direct Link:
Collection:
Mokslo publikacijos / Scientific publications
Document Type:
Straipsnis / Article
Language:
Lietuvių kalba / Lithuanian
Title:
Ekonominės socialinės būklės ir nenaudojamų statinių pasiskirstymo sąsajos Lietuvos kaime
Alternative Title:
Relationship between social economic conditions and distribution of unused rural buildings in Lithuania
In the Journal:
Socialiniai mokslai. 2001, Nr. 6 (32), p. 49-55
Summary / Abstract:

LTStraipsnyje nagrinėjama bešeimininkių ir neūkiškai naudojamų pastatų kaimo vietovėje sklaidos priklausomybė nuo ūkinių, ekonominių, socialinių rodiklių teritorinių ypatumų. Nustatyta, kad žemės ūkio pastatų ir ne su žemės ūkio gamyba susijusių kaimo infrastruktūros pastatų koreliacinės priklausomybės su nagrinėjamais rodikliais yra skirtingos. Todėl pastatų atgaivinimo bei panaudojimo klausimai turi būti sprendžiami, įvertinant nustatytas priklausomybes ir Lietuvos Respublikos teritorijos bendrojo plano erdvinę subalansuotos raidos koncepciją. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Ekonominiai rodikliai; Ekonominė socialinė būklė; Infrastruktūra; Kaimo infrastruktūra; Nenaudojami statiniai kaime; Socialiniai rodikliai; Žemės ūkio sektoriaus reorganizacija; Žemės ūkio turto rinka; Žemės ūkis; Agriculture; Economic indicators; Infrastructure; Reorganization of the agricultural sector; Rural infrastructure; Rural property market; Social economic conditions; Social indicators; Unused rural buildings.

ENRural property constitutes an important part of economic potential in Lithuania. Buildings of farming destination and of rural infrastructure make a great part of this property. Most of these objects were built in the years of Socialism under the conditions of social economy. Political and economic changes were followed by unsuccessful reorganization of the agricultural sector in Lithuania. As a result of this there are many derelict and mismanaged buildings in rural areas now. These buildings are not used for any kind of activity and many of them are semi-destroyed. The same problem is actual in all former socialist countries. Such a phenomenon is negatively influencing the economy of our country. It is hard to revitalize these buildings because of technological and economic changes in our country during the last decade. The aim of the work is to analyse spatial distribution tendencies of derelict and mismanaged agricultural buildings and rural buildings of other destination according to economic as well as social conditions and the development of the mentioned areas. The results of the analysis can facilitate scientific preparation of revitalizing and effective use of rural property. The data on twelve districts of the Lithuanian Republic have been analysed. Observations have been made and distribution peculiarities have been established using the methods of mathematical statistics. Ten groups of indices have been used in the analysis. As a dependant variable in correlation there is a number of derelict and mismanaged buildings of farming destination in 1000 ha of territory in an administrative region.As independent (factorial) variables arc: farming land productivity grade; percent of farming land, rented by district farming communities; parameters of life quality, population activity indices, indices of farming and corn agriculture territorial concentration in the years of 1990 and 1997. Two correlation matrixes according to the destination of buildings have been calculated and statistical connections have been estimated as shown in Fig 1 and Fig 2. The connections are not very significant, but some conclusions can be drawn according to the results of the analysis. Analysing derelict and mismanaged buildings of farming destination it has been estimated that distribution peculiarities of the dependant variable are mostly influenced by indices of fanning territorial concentration, farming land productivity grade and the percent of farming land in a district, rented by district farming communities. These connections are inverse. This can be explained by the fact that stronger collective-farms existed in districts of better agriculture conditions. Stronger collective-farms were less destroyed, more farming communities were founded here. Fanning communities use buildings of farming destination for their agricultural activity. So there are less derelict and mismanaged buildings in these regions. Many of the analysed buildings are private property, but they are not used and almost destroyed, because small farmers are not capable of using large complexes and holding them in proper condition. [...]. [From the publication]

ISSN:
1392-0758
Related Publications:
Permalink:
https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/48001
Updated:
2019-01-15 09:20:31
Metrics:
Views: 15
Export: