Architektūra kaip meno kolekcija. Palangos atvejis

LTDėl pakitusių politinių, ekonominių ir kultūrinių sąlygų XX a. II pusės architektūros ir urbanistikos kūriniai dažnai nebeatitinka šiandienos naudotojų poreikių ir keliamų reikalavimų. Todėl apleidžiami, griaunami ar reikšmingai kinta. Dėl to ryškėja iniciatyvos siūlyti į KVR įtraukti kuo daugiau šio laikmečio kūrinių. Tačiau XX a. IX dešimtmetyje kultūros paminklais tapę naujosios architektūros kūriniai dėl neraiškios saugojimo strategijos, žmogiškųjų ir finansinių išteklių tvarkybai stokos vis tiek nyksta. Todėl kyla abejonių ar registro plėtra bus veiksminga. Straipsnyje Palangos miesto pavyzdžiu nagrinėjamos galimybės sudaryti vėlyvojo modernizmo architektūros kolekciją. Manoma, kad sistemingas kultūriškai vertingų architektūros objektų rinkinys formuojamas apjungiant skirtingus saugojimo metodus gali paskatinti atsakingas institucijas, vietos ir profesines bendruomenes susitelkti atsakingam architektūros paveldo puoselėjimo ir tvaraus naudojimo procesui. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Architektai; Architektūra; Architektūros kolekcija; Kompleksai; Kultūros paveldo registras; Kurortas; Palanga; Pastatai (statiniai), visuomeniniai; Pastatai (statiniai, namai), gyvenamieji; Paveldas; Paveldas, kultūros; Politika; Registrai; Rekreacija; Sovietinė modernizmo architektūra; Sovietmetis; Turizmas; Šiuolaikinė Lietuvos architektūra; Architects; Architecture; Architecture of Soviet Modernism; Buildings (construction), publics; Buildings (construction, homes), habitables; Collection of Architecture; Complex; Contemporary Lithuanian Architecture; Cultural Heritage Register; Heritage; Heritage, culture; Lithuania; Palanga; Politics; Recreation; Registry; Resort; Soviet; Tourism.

ENThe trends in Palanga architecture of the second half of the 19th – first half of the 20th century are represented in the National Cultural Heritage List by 10 villas, 14 residential houses, two hotels (Kurhauses of Nemirseta and Palanga), a pharmacy, a spa building, a ship rescue station and a bus station. But such heritage objects reflect the stages in the town development only partially. If the cultural heritage list of Palanga town is treated as a coherent and continuous collection reflecting different stages in architecture and culture of this town (as it should be), it would be relevant to add a few more samples of the mid and second half of the 20th century architecture to the list. Taking into consideration the presence of exclusive Soviet period architectural objects on the list (made according to recommendations of different professional and social communities), and recommendations of the list founders, the following two educational institutions realized less than 50 years ago that these may as well be enrolled as examples of specific historic period and acknowledged artistic style or trend, and as most progressive and/or artistic architectural solutions of the time, to be protected for public information and use purposes: the music school designed by architect I. Likšienė,1981, (Maironio St.8; see Fig. 1) and former Pioneers’ Palace designed by I. Likšienė and G. P. Likša,1985, (now the elementary school, at the address Virbališkės Takas 4; see Fig. 2). These buildings are distinctive examples of contemporary architecture development. At present managed by the local municipality, they are in good physical state, with retained initial qualities of space and volume structure, use of materials, environment and purpose.[...] Nevertheless, the identified architectural, urban, landscape and engineering values of objects and analyzed possible forms for their conservation (ex-situ and in-situ) could become a basis for scientific study of contemporary architecture and urban planning in Palanga resort. Based on their design material, the initial concepts of such objects should be identified and their present as well planned for the future transformations should be analyzed. Such study to be presented publicly (for example, on the National Cultural Heritage List database) could ensure conditions for better understanding of past and present values of the objects, for both, specialists and public at large, and be a highly valuable source of information describing the architecture of the time to be used for information, scientific and professional purposes. Such study may also become a stimulus for preparation of complex regeneration design projects of objects and landscapes, which would comprise the conservation and development needs and add new artistic values. [From the publication]

• Kritinė erdvinė kūryba tiriant sovietinio laikotarpio Lietuvos architektūrą / Audrius Novickas. Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis 2014, t. 73, p. 91-108.
• Palanga’s modern architecture on the way to heritage / Liutauras Nekrošius, Edita Riaubienė. Architecture and urban planning. 2018, 14, p. 111-118. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022. P. 125-140.
• Sovietinių metų architektūra kaip kultūros vertybė. Vilniaus atvejis / Liutauras Nekrošius. Journal of architecture and urbanism. 2012, Vol. 36, no. 1, p. 38-53.
• The Intended breakaway : the case of recreational architecture in Soviet Lithuania / Jūratė Tutlytė. Meno istorija ir kritika. 2007, 3, p. 111-118.