Lietuvos nacionalinės Martyno Mažvydo bibliotekos rankraščių fondo formavimas XX amžiaus 8-9 dešimtmetyje

LTDokumentinio fondo kaupimas, sistemingas ir apgalvotas jo komplektavimas, atitinkantis atminties institucijos misiją, interesus ir poreikius, yra viena pagrindinių tokios institucijos funkcijų. Žiūrint iš istorinio taško, dokumentinio fondo formavimas atspindi laikmečio aktualijas, institucijos vykdomą politiką, situacijos supratimą ir įsipareigojimus visuomenei. Sovietmečio ideologija negalėjo nepaliesti ir šios bibliotekų veiklos, tačiau tyrinėjant to laikotarpio dokumentus, kuriuose tokia veikla užfiksuota, galima rasti įrodymų, kad tuo metu buvo įsigyjama ir „ideologiškai kenksmingų“ dokumentų. Ši situacija nagrinėjama straipsnyje. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Archyviniai dokumentai; Jonė Žebrytė; Komplektavimas; Lietuvos nacionalinė Martyno Mažvydo biblioteka; Rankraštynai; Rankraščiai; Sovietmetis; Acquisition; Archival document; Archival documents; Archival materials; Archives; Complectation; Formation; Jonė Žebrytė; Manuscript; Manuscripts; Martynas Mažvydas National Library of Lithuania; Sources of acquisition; Soviet period.

ENDocument collection, systematic and reasonable acquisition, and interests and needs of a certain organization are among its main functions. From the historical point of view, formation of a document collection reflects the actualities of the time, policies, understandings and public obligations of an institution. It could seem that the soviet ideology couldn’t disregard such library activities; however, exploring the documents of that time reveal some paradoxical things such as acquiring “ideologically wrong” documents. What was the motivation of these actions? What was their interpretation among colleagues? Research of material found in various sources shows that, despite the existing system, the acquisition of the National Library manuscript document collection was little influenced by common attitudes. The collection had been supplemented with documents of various historical periods, in various languages. Laconic and very general entries in the Document Acquisition Book let to hide the content of documents. The main sources of acquisition were purchasing and donations, purchasing being the most frequent source of acquisitions. A conclusion should be made that the library made investments to preserve historical documents, and the librarians responsible for these processes were aware of their importance. [From the publication]