LTStraipsnyje nagrinėjami tarpasmeninių konfliktų ypatumai didelio meistriškumo sportininkų komandose, išskiriami tokie veiksniai kaip: konfliktiškumas sportininkų diadose, individualaus konfliktiškumo indeksas, tiriamas ryšys tarp jų ir sportininko asmenybės sa\ybių bei rezultatyvumą lemiančių veiksnių. Tyrime dalyravo aštuonios didelio sportinio meistriškumo komandos: keturios krepšinio, dvi tinklinio ir dvi beisbolo. Tyrimų rezultatai parodė, kad individualūs sportininkų konfliktiškumo indeksai diadose yra maži (i=4, kai I max=16). Pirmos, antros ir penktos komandų konfliktiškumas yra didesnis nei vidutinis. Ketvirtoje komandoje egzistuoja tiesioginis ryšys taip individualaus konfliktiškumo koeficiento ir asmenybės faktoriaus Q (r=0,83; p=0,01). Šeštoje komandoje nustatytas atvirkštinis ryšys taip individualaus konfliktiškumo indekso ir asmenybės faktoriaus QI (r=-0,78;p=-0,03). Trečioje komandoje buvo nustatytas atvirkštinis ryšys taip individualus konfliktiškumo indekso ir sportinio stažo (r=-0,73; p=0,03), šeštoje komandoje - tiesioginis ryšys tarp individualaus konfliktiškumo koeficiento ir perimtų kamuolių (r=0,64; p=0,04), o aštuntoje komandoje - tarp individualaus konfliktiškumo koeficiento ir baudų pataikymo procento (r=0,88;p=0,00). [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Asmenybės savybės; Didelis meistriškumas; Komandinės sporto šakos; Konfliktiškumas; Elite sport; Interpersonal conflicts; Personal qualities; Team sport; Team sports.
ENPrevious research have demonstrated that observation of model performance can have an influence on goal choice and the quality of performance of an observer. Our investigation revealed the influence of model performance on expectations of a person, on the level of performance and on self-evaluation. The subjects were 40 I-III year students specialized as basketball players at Lithuanian Academy of Physical Education (LAPE). The main aim of the present investigation was to reveal the influence of model performance on goal-setting, self-evaluation and the results of performance of basketball players. The following methods of research have been used: 1) analysis of literary sources; 2) questionnaires; 3) mathematical statistics (ANOVA). The participants were asked to watch a training session, to perform on a free throwing task and then to answer some questions. Before starting to watch the film all the participants were asked to complete a Self-evaluation Scale (Palaima, 1984). The corresponding data showed that the model performance and trial interaction have had an influence on participants' goals as well as on the results of performance and they are closely linked with the level of self-evaluation. Aiming at finding out the influence of independent variables one of the two versions of the training film was presented to them. Results of this research revealed that LAPE basketball players who exposed to a high-performing model set higher goals and performed better on the task than basketball players who exposed to a low-performing model (p<0.001). In conclusion, low self-evaluation basketball players were more influenced by the model performance than basketball players with high self-evaluation (p<0.05). [From the publication]