Kai kurie psichinės prievartos doktrinos probleminiai aspektai

LTAtsižvelgiant į tai, kad baudžiamosios teisės teorijoje suformuluota psichinės prievartos doktrina yra gana plati ir psichinės prievartos elementas kompleksiškai nagrinėjamas įvairiais aspektais, straipsnyje pasirinktos analizuoti kelios šios doktrinos probleminės sritys. Straipsnyje aptarta psichinės prievartos išraiškos formų įvairovės problema, pastebint, kad neretai baudžiamosios teisės specialistų darbuose psichinės prievartos formos aiškinamos gana plačiai, nesiejant jų tik su įvairaus turinio grasinimais. Analizuojant grasinimus, kaip psichinės prievartos išraiškos formą, atkreiptas dėmesys ir į šantažo dilemą, kuri siejama su šios veikos kriminalizavimo pagrindimo sunkumais. Šios problemos analizei pasitelktos baudžiamosios teisės doktrinoje pateikiamos ekonominė, liberalioji ir trečiosios šalies teorijos. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Baudžiamoji atsakomybė; Fizinė prievarta; Psichinis gniuždymas; Psichinis smurtas; Psichinė prievarta; Terorizavimas; Šantažas; Blackmail; Criminal responsibility; Mental violence; Physical violence; Psychological compression.

ENGiven the fact that the doctrine of mental violence formed in the theory of criminal law is rather broad and the element of mental violence analyzed in various aspects is subject to the Criminal Law institute where it is used, some problematic fields of this doctrine have been chosen for analysis. The article points out that there is no single opinion of Criminal Law specialists on the potential forms of expression of mental violence. Some authors interpret the forms of mental expression quite broadly by ascribing the threat to mental violence as well as other variants of its expression, for example, physical violence, insult, slander, administering some narcotic or psychotropic substances. Meanwhile others consider various types of threats as the only way of mental violence, because the essence of mental violence is firstly related to causing fear in another person. Physical violence is ascribed to this threatening effect as well. It is worth mentioning that physical violence has always been related to a negative effect on a person’s psyche, however, not all such abuse should be regarded as mental violence. Therefore, physical violence can be considered as mental violence only if the perpetrator tries to frighten a person while attacking one physically or using other types of abuse. The article also discusses the issue of the blackmailing dilemma, which is related to the substantiation problems of criminalization of this deed, analyzed in most works by Criminal Law specialists. Economic and liberal theories, as well as the theory of the third party, have been invoked as the basis of the analysis of the blackmailing dilemma. [From the publication]