Nauja Lietuvos Respublikos politinių partijų ir politinių kampanijų finansavimo bei finansavimo kontrolės įstatymo redakcija - politinis impulsas ar būtinybė?
LTStraipsnyje, vertinant iš Lietuvos teisinės sistemos perspektyvų, analizuojamos Europos Tarybos valstybių prieš korupcijų grupės (angl. Group of States against Corruption,) (toliau - GRECO) vertinimo ataskaitoje Lietuvai politinių partijų finansavimo skaidrumo srityje (angl. Evaluation Report) suformuluotos rekomendacijos, jų pagrįstumas bei atitiktis faktinei situacijai. Jame taip pat skiriama dėmesio GRECO atitikties ataskaitoje (angl. Compliance Report) pateiktam minėtų rekomendacijų įgyvendinimo lygiui aptarti irfaktinei jų įgyvendinimo apimčiai nustatyti. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Administracinė teisė; Finansavimo kontrolė; GRECO; GRECO vetinimo atitikties ataskaita; Politinių kampanijų finansavimas ir kontrolė; Politinių partijų finansavimas; Politinių partijų įstatymas; Politinių partijų, kampanijų finansavimas; Vertinimo ataskaita; Administrative Law, the Law on Political Parties, Political campaign financing and control; Control of funding; Evaluation report; Funding of political parties; Funding of political parties and political campaigns; GRECO; Greco Evaluation Compiliance Report.
ENThe article - assessing from the prospects of Lithuanian legal system - analyses the recommendations for Lithuania formulatedin the Evaluation Report of GRECO in the field of transparency of funding ofpolitical parties, their validity and adequacy to the factual situation. The attention is paid towards both the level of implementation of before mentioned recommendations, which is reflected in Compliance Report of GRECO, and the factual extent of their implementation. The leading idea of this article is evaluation of the necessity to amend the Law on Funding of Political Parties and Political Campaigns. The questions risen in it are answered gradually, separately dealing with each in the Evaluation report of GRECO stated recommendation. So in this way a bit extraordinary structure of the article was determined.Two main conclusions are drawn in the end o f the article. Despite o f the findings presented in the Compliance Report of GRECO that only three recommendations of all embodied in the Evaluation Report of GRECO were implemented partialy, factually Lithuania has implemented barely a half of them, moreover, namely those which needed least efforts to implement. As the analysis o f the recommendations formulated in the Evaluation Report of GRECO shows, there is a reasonable basis for challenging some of the recommendations inreference to their adequacy to contemporary legal and factual reality of Lithuania, as well as the necessity to implement them, because from the systematic scope of v i ew it can result in regress instead of progress. [From the publication]
