Partinių sistemų stabilumo samprata ir matavimas : Lietuvos situacija 1990-2010 metais

LTStraipsnyje analizuojamas Lietuvos partinės sistemos stabilumas 1990–2010 metais trijuose lygmenyse: rinkimų, parlamento ir vyriausybės. Matuojant šį reiškinį remiamasi Mogenso N. Pederseno, Peterio Mairo ir Giovannio Santorio suformuotais tyrimo instrumentais, įvertinant jų trūkumus ir patobulinant. Daroma išvada, kad ilgainiui Lietuvos partinė sistema tapo nestabili visuose lygmenyse. Pirma, aukštas rinkimų nestabilumas pastebimas per visų 1990–2010 m. laikotarpį. Antra, Lietuvos partinėje sistemoje taip ir nepavyko įsitvirtinti nuosaikaus daugiapartizmo tipui. Trečia, konkurencijos dėl vyriausybės vietų struktūra po 2000 m. tapo visiškai destabilizuota. Be to, straipsnyje patvirtinama, kad partinės sistemos stabilumas yra daugiadimensinis reiškinys. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: , fragmentacija; Antisisteminė partija; Fragmentacija; Ideologinis atstumas; Konkurencija dėl vyriausybės vietų; Konkurencinė kova dėl vyriausybės vietų; Partijų pakeitima; Partijų pakeitimas; Partinė sistema; Partinės sistemos stabilumas; Poliarizacija; Politinė sistema ir jos stabilumas; Reikšminga partija; Rinkėjų elgsenos kaita; Rinkėjų elgsenos kaitumas; Anti - system party; Anti-system party; Competition for government seats; Competition for the seats; Electoral volatility; Fragmentation; Fragmentation, ideological distance; Ideological distance; Party replacation; Party replacement; Party system; Party system stability; Polarization; Relevant party.

ENFour main conclusions are reached in this article: 1) electoral volatility in Lithuania was high trough all independence period and dropped significantly only in last parliament election (however, it is still substantially high); 2) in period 1990–2000 Lithuania's party system's state could be described as moderate pluralism in the making, but since 2000 increase of fragmentation and emergence of bilateral oppositions has changed this tendency; 3) in period 1990–2000 party system was leaning towards closing of competition structure, but since 2000 it has became completely instable; 4) the case of Lithuania confirms that party system stability is multidimensional phenomena: instability in one level doesn't necessary reflect strictly same tendencies of instability in other levels.Party system stability is an important prerequisite for effective functioning of the democratic political system. Moreover, party system stability specifically influences functioning of the parliament institution. In Lithuania's context it raises a question – has our party system ever been close to the desired stability through the independence period, or has the instability level always been a negative factor for the effective parliament work? Party system stability is treated as multidimensional phenomena: since party systems function at electoral, parliament and governmental levels, stability should be also analyzed in each of them. Therefore the aim of this article is to evaluate the development of Lithuania's party system stability in 1990–2010, while applying theoretical approaches that emphasize different dimensions of stability. 3 main tasks are implemented in order to reach this aim: 1) to define a concept of party system; 2) to form a conception of the party system stability and delineate instruments for measuring it; 3) to apply the formed research tools for the Lithuania's situation. Three theoretical models (and instruments of party system measurement related with them) are discussed, modified and applied for the completion of these tasks: party system typology of G. Sartori, M. Pedersen's electoral volatility index and P. Mair's scheme of party competition for government seats. [From the publication]