Vardažodinių priesagų vedinių kirčiavimo raida

LTReikšminiai žodžiai: Baritonai; Kirčiavimas; Kirčiavimo modelis; Oksitonai; Priesaga -iškas, -a; Priesaga -ybė; Priesaginių vedinių kirčiavimas; Priesagos vedinys; Sosiūro ir Fortūnatovo dėsnis; Accentuation; Accentuation of suffixal derivatives; Barytone-root; De Saussure and Fortunatov's law; Oxytone-root; Stress pattern; Suffix -iškas, -a; Suffix -ybė; Suffixal derivative.

ENSynchronicallv, the accentuation of the derivatives is conditioned by the accentual properties of Us lormanl. the suffix. A diachronic examination reveals a shghth different picture It is obvious that in Daukša's times there were two accentual types of suffixal derivations in Lithuanian: (1) the accent ofthe derivative defined by the type of formation or the formant and (2) the accent of the derivative depending on the paradigm of the base word These stress patterns arc clearly seen in the dual accentuation of the bary tone-root derivatives with the suffix -ybė in Daukša's works, e.g. bjaurybė I bjaurybe Their original accentuation is doubtless related to their base words, and it was only later that the nouns in -ybė came to be stressed according to a fixed-stress paradigm with a generalized toneme. It is quite probable that m the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries there were more accentual systems of Lithuanian suffixal derivatives the catechism of 1605 attests a mobile-stress paradigm, peculiar to oxytone-root nouns, viz. didybė. Considering that the strong position of the suffix was in the process of formation in Daukšas times, it can be surmised that the influence of the dc Saussure and I'ortunatov's law, still active, could have been profound in this development The accentuation development of the derivatives of weak suffixes is best illustrated by the adjectives with the suffix -iškas, -a which in Daukša's times seem to have been stressed only according to the paradigm of the base word. In this paper it is maintained that the stress most likely was shifted not from the inflection but from the first syllable of the derivative root, i.e. to the right, as is generally peculiar to the disyllabic nominal derivatives of Modern Lithuanian.This hypothesis is based on several arguments In summing up, it can be stated that primarily the stress shift to the right is arguably linked to the effect of de Saussure and Fortunatov's law. [From the publication]