Prieštaringi Lietuvos respublikos baudžiamojo kodekso 192 straipsnio interpretavimo aspektai

LTStraipsnyje nagrinėjami aktualūs Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo kodekso 192 straipsnio interpretavimo aspektai: aptariamas nusikaltimo sudėčių, esančių BK 192 straipsnyje, klausimas bei pateikiama mokslinių argumentų, ką reikėtų laikyti BK 192 straipsnyje uždraustos veikos (nusikaltimo) dalyku. Taip pat pateikiama siūlymų, kokiomis kryptimis, autoriaus nuomone, reikėtų tobulinti patį BK 192 staipsnį. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamasis kodeksas; Intelektinė nuosavybė; Criminal code of the Republic of Lithuania; Intelectual property.

ENThe article discusses relevant aspects of interpretation of Article 192 of Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania: proposes scholastic arguments regarding object of crime and discusses bodies of crimes in Article 192 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania. In addition the article gives proposals for how to improve Article 192 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Article raises the idea that interpretation and application of Article 192 of Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania is alienated from the primary source of criminal liability, i.e. from the text of Article 192. According to the author Article 192 of Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania does not protect the rights of holders of the related rights. However the courts apply Article 192 expansively as if it protected, inter alia, the related rights. Therefore application of Article 192 infringes the principle nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege. The author of the article suggests amending the Article 192 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania by adding criminal liability for infringements of related rights. [From the publication]