Arvydo Šliogerio fenomenas šiuolaikinėje Lietuvos filosofijoje

LTStraipsnyje pristatoma ir nagrinėjama žymiausio dabartinio lietuvių filosofo Arvydo Šliogerio kūryba. Apžvelgiant pagrindinius Šliogerio veikalus, parodoma, kaip formavosi ir brendo jo mąstymas, kaip kito nagrinėjamų problemų laukas ir koks yra šio autoriaus santykis su savo kūryba. Atskirai nagrinėjamos pagrindinės Šliogerio filosofinės sąvokos - Niekis ir Esmas bei pastarajam idėjiškai artima filotopijos sąvoka. Galiausiai reziumuojama, kad Šliogerio neįmanoma įsprausti į jokios metodologijos rėmus, o tai veikiausiai ir sąlygojo, kad taip ir nesusiformavo jokia Šliogerio metodologinė mokykla, nors pastarajam vadovaujant į Lietuvos akademinį diskursą įsitraukė nemažai gabių bei drąsių tyrinėtojų. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Šliogeris; Mickūnas; Šliogeris; Mickūnas; Lietuvos filosofija; Autorius ir tekstas; Niekis; Esmas; Lithuanian philosophy; Author and Text; Nothing; Isness.

ENThe author analyses and presents the thoughts of the most famous contemporary Lithuanian philosopher Arvydas Šliogeris. In Lithuanian academic and cultural circles, there are numerous researches focused on various Šliogeris' oeuvres and ideas. However, the extensive and varied works of this philosopher have not yet been thoroughly explored. This paper does not pretend to offer such an exploration; rather, it attempts to offer a brief presentation of the main interpretations of Šliogeris' ideas developed in his works. The author presents some of the essential outlines and developments of Šliogeris' thought and shows how this author perceives his own texts. In order to accomplish this task, the author summarizes the main concepts of Šliogeris' philosophy in his work Nothing and Isness, and shows the flexibility and synthesis of the two main concepts. The synthesis is called "Am (I)” wave where the alphapoint has no fixed place and can move either to the side of Nothing or to the side of Isness. The author concludes that Šliogeris' philosophy cannot be subsumed under any philosophical methodology, although he is most closely associated with phenomenology, even if he cannot be defined as a phenomenologist. Presumably for this reason Šliogeris has not founded his own methodological school, although his former students are well known as gifted and courageous scholars. [From the publication]