Nomadinis mąstymas ir estetika be teritorijų

• Logos (Vilnius). 2005, 44, p. 67-72
• Logos (Vilnius). 2006, 45, p. 43-51

LTStraipsnis skirtas pastaraisiais dešimtmečiais postmodernioje estetikoje ir meno filosofijoje išryškėjusių nomadologijos tendencijų ir estetikos tyrinėjimų laukų kaitai aptarti. Šiandien, kai estetika skverbiasi į įvairias anksčiau buvusias marginalines ir kasdienybės sritis, svarbu pasiaiškinti gelmines šių pokyčių priežastis ir pasekmes tolesnei estetinės minties raidai. Todėl straipsnyje įvairiais aspektais gvildenamos filosofinės problematikos estetinimo tendencijos, teorinė naujų estetinių ir meninių realijų atsiradimo refleksija postmodernistinėje sąmonėje, tyrinėjamas dėl globalizacijos procesų poveikio ryškėjantis įvairių civilizacijų estetikos ir meno filosofijos tradicijų suartėjimas ir naujų pažinimo teritorijų formavimasis. Ypatingas dėmesys skiriamas estetikos ir meno filosofijos tyrinėjimo objektuose atsiskleidusioms metamorfozėms, dabartinės problematikos pokyčiams. [Iš Įvado]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Estetikos teritorijos; Neklasikinė estetika; Nomadologija; Postmoderni estetika; Postmodernistinė estetika; Nomadology; Non-classic aesthetics; Postmodern aesthetics; Postmodern esthetics; Fields of aesthetics.

ENStudy is dedicated to the discussion concerning the changes in the field of aesthetic inquiry which has manifested itself during the last decades in postmodern aesthetics. It concentrates on metamorphoses in the subject of aesthetic inquiry and the changes in the problematic of postmodern aesthetics caused by the influence of Eastern aesthetics traditions and the electronic media. All these changes initiate the manifest expansion of aesthetic theories and penetration of daily life culture by aesthetic phenomena. Such a penetration was significant to non-European aesthetic traditions but of no importance to Classical Western aesthetics. The limits of contemporary aesthetic science were considerably expanded and deprived of distinct determinations; the attitude to the subject of that science and to the field of its main problems changed. Aesthetic inquiry penetrates new territories previously treated as unaesthetic and includes them in the field of the significantly expanded field of aesthetic objects, the subjects of investigation of contemporary aesthetics.The rise of these new problematic fields is directly related to the rapid development of means of communication in the culture of super-civilisation, to the modification of aesthetic experience, to the disappearance of boundaries between different spheres of life. The most characteristic traits of contemporary aesthetic thinking are the intensification of the circulation of aesthetic ideas between different cultural worlds and the migration of various artistic symbols and aesthetic concepts to spheres previously regarded as unaesthetic. The new postmodern aesthetic experience surpasses the limits of aesthetics established by traditional Western metaphysics, enriching the content of aesthetic inquiry by the traditions of different cultures and their junctions, expanding its territory within the limits between the harmony of the Universe and the aesthetic topology of the body. These changes were caused by the rise of the problematic fields which were previously situated on the margins of academic studies. [...]. [From the publication]