Mandatory mediation in family disputes - an emerging trend in the European Union?
ENThe Mediation Directive (2008) obliged the Member States of the European Union to promote the use of mediation through their own means. A decade later, the results of several studies revealed that national efforts to foster mediation were not as effective as planned in most cases. Despite some scholars’ concerns about restricting mediation voluntariness as means for increasing its application, Italy introduced a mandatory mediation scheme which proved that forcing parties to mediate results in high numbers of mediation procedures with favorable success rates. This led other Member States to reconsider the role of the State in fostering mediation. This article tackles the prevalence of mandatory mediation in family disputes, as an area widely recognized as most suitable for it. The co-authors raised the research question of whether the introduction of mandatory mediation in family disputes is an emerging trend in the European Union. A short overview of the mandatory mediation concept and the existing doctrinal models was presented as a theoretical background of this research. Based on the review of the scientific literature, four prevailing models were identified and briefly described. Secondly, the map of mandatory mediation within the European Union was updated with the latest data collected from the most recent legislative amendments and testimonies of the corresponding national mediation experts. Thirdly, a brief examination of the current mandatory mediation models in the Member States was conducted. The indepth analysis of the obtained results shows that introducing mandatory mediation in family disputes is a prevailing trend in fostering mediation in the European Union. Consequently, it was identified that the variety of implemented models went far beyond the existing doctrinal classification, which needs to be reconsidered by future research in this field.Keywords: family dispute, family mediation, Mediation Directive, mandatory mediation, categorical mandatory mediation, discretional mandatory mediation, quasi-mandatory mediation. [From the publication]
- Mediation in the Baltic States: developments and challenges of implementation / Agnė Tvaronavičienė, Natalija Kaminskienė, Dana Rone and Rea Uudeküll. Access to justice in Eastern Europe 2022, 4 (16), p. 68-86.
- Privaloma mediacija šeimos ginčuose Lietuvoje: modelis ir pirmųjų taikymo metų patirtis / Agnė Tvaronavičienė, Odeta Intė. ADR - lokalne rozwiązania w kontekście globalnym = ADR - local solutions in a global context / pod redakcją Magdaleny Tabernackiej. Wrocław : Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2021. P. 37-52, 53-69.
- Privalomosios mediacijos civiliniuose ginčuose ir teisės į teisminę gynybą santykio problemos : disertacija / Miglė Žukauskaitė-Tatorė. Vilnius : Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2021. 268 p.
- The Implementation of mandatory family mediation schemes in the context of the Istanbul Convention / Yuliya Radanova, Indrė Korsakovienė, Anzhela Krychyna. International Comparative Jurisprudence. 2024, Vol. 10, no. 1, p. 159-176.
