Europeanisation of post‐Soviet prisons: a comparative case study of prison policy transfer from Norway to Latvia and Lithuania
ENDespite shared history and a common ambition to comply with European standards, post-Soviet countries differ in the way in which they reform prisons. By investigating two most-similar cases of policy transfer from Norway – the establishment of the Olaine Drug Centre in Latvia and the Pravieniškės Drug Unit in Lithuania – this article explains why outcomes diverge and how Western-European carceral individualism clashes with path-dependent carceral collectivism. Where leadership is unstable, with limited powers, the informal legacies are strong, and policy-transfer strategy is fragmented, as in Lithuania, the outcome is likely to be non-transformative. Where, on the contrary, leadership is stable, enjoying larger discretionary powers and the intervention strategy is holistic, as in Latvia, the import of foreign institutional models is likely to be successful. [From the publication]
- Country survey : criminology, crime and criminal justice in Lithuania / Aleksandras Dobryninas, Gintautas Sakalauskas. European journal of criminology. 2011, Vol. 8, no. 5, p. 421-434.
- The Dignity of punishment: vulnerable prisoners’ rights in Lithuania / Simonas Nikartas, Liubovė Jarutienė. Legal protection of vulnerable groups in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland. Trends and perspectives / edited by Agnė Limantė and Dovilė Pūraitė-Andrikienė. Cham : Springer Cham, 2022. P. 247-262.
- Transformations in prison subculture and adjustment to imprisonment in Post-Soviet Lithuanian penitentiary institutions / Rūta Vaičiūnienė, Artūras Terškinas. East European politics and societies and cultures. 2017, 31, 3, p. 659-679.
