Vilnius memoryscape: razing and raising of monuments, collective memory and national identity

ENThrough the lens of semiotic landscapes, I analyse here collective memory formation in the Baltic republic of Lithuania. A theoretical focus on power relation in “monumental politics”, the concept of memoryscape (Clack, 2011), Van Gennep’s 2004 sociological application of liminality, and a methodological approach that “treats space as a discursive as well as physical formation” (Jaworski & Thurlow, 2010) are combined to examine the process of monument destruction, creation, and alteration in post-Soviet Vilnius. I argue that cultural landscapes represent not only relationships of power within societies but are also used as a tool of nation-building and power legitimation. I highlight a fourfold process: (1) razing – monumental landscape cleansing; (2) raising – the return of memory via the creation of national historical continuity symbols and of new lieux de mémoire (Nora, 1996) and the memorization complex (Train, 2016); (3) polyphonic memorial narratives of empty spaces; and (4) the memory limbo helix or recursive memories. [Publisher annotation]

• Historical dictionary of Lithuania / Saulius Sužiedėlis. Lanham [etc.] : Scarecrow Press, 2011. xxxiii, 391 p.
• The Genius loci, public spaces and transformations of Vilnius' urban milieu / Almantas Samalavičius. Lituanus. 2016, vol. 62, no. 1, p. 40-58, 93.
• The Making and breaking of Soviet Lithuania : memory and modernity in the wake of war / Violeta Davoliūtė. London ; Routledge, 2013. xx, 211 p.
• Vilnius between nations, 1795-2000 / Theodore R. Weeks. DeKalb, IL : Northern Illinois University Press, 2015. xii, 308 p.